On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 13.12.13, Geoffrey Gowey wrote: > hmm... the only defines occurring are the defaults created by > configure.Commenting out everything out so only > > err = getpwnam_r(userName.toLocal8Bit().constData(), &pw, buf, > bufSize, &tmpPw); > > remains results in a successful compile.
Indeed, which is why I said that using _POSIX_C_SOURCE for the testing is wrong. That's the macro that the source code uses to tell the system headers what POSIX version it wants. The system headers report what version it provides in _POSIX_VERSION. We got the two macros mixed up. > BTW- Who do I write to in order to get these bugfixes incorporated? > Stepping away then trying to do a pull down and build is causing me grief > since I forgot that I already reported these bugs. You're the only one who can do those fixes, since apparently you're the only person testing Solaris. Please submit the fixes and we'll incorporate them. Don't expect that reporting the issue on the mailing list will trigger a fix. We have no way of testing Solaris, so the fix must come from you in the form of a patch. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
