On quinta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2012 11.48.26, Sorvig Morten wrote: > > The above is much more than adding a symbol as an artifact of a change. > > It's whole new API and features. It should not go into 4.8. > > I think we need to take a second look at the 4.8 submit policy. > > I'd like to make a special argument for allowing 33266, and then a general > argument for allowing API additions to Qt 4 in response to platform > changes.
I understand your request. But it is nonetheless a new feature and Lars needs to approve the breaking of the freeze in 4.8. We could name it 4.9.0 if we wanted to, but it would probably open a bigger can of worms. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
