On domingo, 9 de setembro de 2012 13.25.29, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > The solution for a bug can never be to wilfully break existing applications! > What can I as an application developer depend on if that's deemed > acceptable? "Yeah, we had a feature, and yeah, people depend on it, but we > don't give a damn." --- that's the message. And no matter how you dress it > up with inevitability and force majeure and whatever, that doesn't change > the message that Qt cannot be depended upon by application developers.
If it will make you sleep better at night, then it's a bug.
A bug means that it's unintentional and we'll correct the situation in a
future release. So you can depend on Qt: we will make things work and keep
them working.
We just can't promise when that will be. And except when they break.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
