> With FSEvents you cannot emit signals such as fileChanged(), fileModified(), > pathCreated(), or pathDeleted() if all you're notified about is that > "something happened in this folder here",
>From my experience building an app that 'watches' a folder and imports all files of a certain type added there, I would prefer that QFSW was simple and reliable and doesn't attempt to impose a heavy cost or internal complexity (which translates into bugs) for things that the underlying APIs do not really support - leaving it up to the app to decide how best to handle these limitations. As you say, applications which are watching (possibly large) directory trees will likely have their own database of content which they will compare any changes to. The app can optimize this in domain-specfic ways, such as not recording any information about types of files it doesn't care about. Here is the FSEvents wrapper we use on Mac for example: https://gist.github.com/3149811 If the underlying APIs for fine-grained notifications and broad file system watches are quite different (as is the case for Mac), I think it makes sense not to try and 'paper over' that in the Qt APIs, so providing different classes would be better. > Would be easiest to implement, we could even drop all the threading currently > there now. There is a lot to be said for internal simplicity, especially where threading is concerned. Regards, Rob. On 20 July 2012 06:28, logic.cpp <logic....@gmail.com> wrote: > #1 > Clarification of original post: > > When I say "Making QFileSystemWatcher Recursive" I mean *adding* new functions > for recursive monitoring, such as "addPathRecursively()". I don't mean to > replace the current non-recursive functinality, which is very useful in its > own > right (for "A" category use cases mentioned). > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development