On quinta-feira, 5 de julho de 2012 10.44.52, Marc Mutz wrote: > On Thursday July 5 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 4 de julho de 2012 23.09.03, Marc Mutz wrote: > > > Any opinions either way? > > > > There are no plans to write any class to replace QFuture. However, > > renaming > > the class right now is close to impossible due to source-compatibility > > requirements. > > Ok, then I would request permission to move QFuture from QtConcurrent to > QtCore/threads, so users will be able to use it with QPromise and any > thread-pool in 5.1. > > I'll prepare a patch if there's no opposition.
Go ahead and prepare a patch. But I will reserve the decision until after I've
seen it and are able to determine what the impact will be.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
