[snip]
> This builds a progressive enablement of system access.
> Anonymous - can see issues
> Users (Contributors) - can raise and comment on issues, see linked
> source code through Fisheye plugin and be assigned issues Current
> Assignee - can edit issues and progress them through the workflow
> Triager - can assign issues Engineer (Approver) - can do all the
> previous roles and some other specialized things like Watcher
> management.
> [couple of other roles not worth dwelling on at the moment]
>
> Some more detail on the criteria to become a Triager, the process
> involved, the communication mechanism used etc would be appreciated to
> complete enabling this capability.

I'd suggest nomination by an approver.
This covers both the elevation of a user (based on doing the work in JIRA 
comments but getting somebody else to press the workflow buttons), and 
delegation to a team member (for larger development teams e.g. in Nokia/Digia)

The responsibilities of a Triager are less than an Approver, so the nomination 
process shouldn't be more difficult.

________________________________
Subject to local law, communications with Accenture and its affiliates 
including telephone calls and emails (including content), may be monitored by 
our systems for the purposes of security and the assessment of internal 
compliance with Accenture policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________

www.accenture.com

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to