> QML may be revolutionary, but it does not target the right camp. It > targets the designer/amateur-coder audience. "Awww, poor baby. C++ too > hard for you? Here's some meta-descriptive-GUI language where you can > use simple javascript statements/code to implement all your back-end > (and subsequently, perform non-trivial bindings)".
I am one of the dumbdumbs who like QML. Many of our devs find it remarkably productive. Maybe there was insufficient air flow in the Oslo office? If we get the tooling correct we should be infinitely more approachable to designers. QML is very human readable and hence lends itself to tinkering/polishing by designers, but I think one should probably have honed one's coding chops prior to writing a complex QML project from scratch. My $0.02 in any case -- ------------------------------- °v° Donald Carr /(_)\ Vaguely Professional Penguin lover ^ ^ Cave canem, te necet lingendo Chasing my own tail; hate to see me leave, love to watch me go _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
