On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Atlant Schmidt <aschm...@dekaresearch.com> wrote: > Qt "the product" may be developed by a meritocracy of devel- > opers but it damned-well better respond in a more-or-less > democratic way to the needs/demands of the consumers of the > product. If it doesn't, those consumers will move on to > using other frameworks.
That isn't how reality works. You cannot tell me (as a volunteer) what I ought to be spending my time on any more than I can tell you what color to paint your livingroom. My interests dictate what I invest my time into, not random people on the internet. As a developer working on Qt, I will probably keep users' interests in mind, but at the end of the day, it's still my decision. Now, these "consumers" might get lucky a lot of the time and find that what I consider fun usually matches up with what they desire from an application development framework, but there's no guarentee for that. If they want one, then they have to invest time or money into making it happen - there really is no such thing as a completely free lunch. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
