On 05/12/2012 08:28 PM, d3fault wrote: > whereas the point I'm trying to make is that the Qt Project generates > *enough* money based purely on Commercial Sales (which mostly just > boil down to support anyways -- the LGPL is good enough for *most* > Commercial uses) to drive it's own development.
Are you kidding here? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
