On 3 May 2012 11:30, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > On quinta-feira, 3 de maio de 2012 12.18.47, Pierre Vorhagen wrote: >> This is something that integrates well with the open governance concept >> too, as I think that there's still a considerable gap between users and >> contributors of Qt. Maybe this is something to consider in order to >> narrow it a little more. > > Casper, as the documentation and qdoc maintainer, should have a say, probably > the final say. > > There's also another option, which is to have a "Qt developers documentation", > probably matching the next unreleased version of Qt. That way, we, the > developers, can easily locate the source code when proof-reading our > documentation and verify that it does what it says it should do.
One thing we've been doing in the network subsystem is adding information to the wiki pages about how things fit together. Olivier has done the same thing for QStringBuilder and QMutex too. I think having more information like this would be a good way to make it easier for people to navigate the source tree. http://qt-project.org/wiki/PortalQt-Internals Cheers Rich. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
