Hi, About qtpim issues, I can reproduce the issue and I confirm that the qorganizer tests are quite flacky :-/ I am explicitly now looping in a few organizer folks who might help understanding what's going on in there. I am also planning to give a look as well during today...so let's stay in touch and synch up via email or IRC. Do you have any ideas already of what the reason for the flakiness might be?
Br, -Cristiano ________________________________________ Cristiano di Flora, PhD SW Architect / Technical lead, Nokia MP - Qt Software development Visiokatu 3 33720, Tampere (FINLAND) ________________________________________ On 4/18/12 9:10 PM, "ext [email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: >qtsensors and qtlocation merged (thanks Friedemann). > >qtsystems needs a fix in qtbase >(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,23709) before we can try to >restage https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,21847 and friends. > >qtpim is failing several tests because of assumptions on QHash element >order. I'm disabling them in >https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,23705. The organizermanager >autotest has also failed on _some_ CI runs: > > jsondb: no process found > FAIL! : tst_QOrganizerManager::remove(mgr='memory') Compared values >are not the same > Actual (cm->itemsForExport().size()): 3 > Expected (2): 2 > Loc: [tst_qorganizermanager.cpp(1564)] > >Kent > > >________________________________________ >From: [email protected] >[[email protected]] on behalf of >Hansen Kent (Nokia-MP/Oslo) >Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:40 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Development] api_changes merged back to master > >qtdeclarative/api_changes got merged, and now several others after that. > >qtpim, qtsensors and qtsystems still remaining (merge attempts are all >in progress). > >Best regards, >Kent > > > >Den 18. april 2012 00:29, skrev ext Donald Carr: >> yetch, and again, sorry Kent >> >> Were I but a beautiful woman, I would lend you a hug to give you the >> power to put this turkey down, once and for all. >> >> KO >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:36 PM,<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> The qtdeclarative merge >>>(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,23550) still hasn't gone >>>through; tests are crashing in the latest attempt. >>> >>> Modules that depend on qtdeclarative won't be able to merge any >>>changes until the above merge is completed. >>> >>> Kent >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: [email protected] >>>[[email protected]] on behalf of >>>Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo) >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:52 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [Development] api_changes merged back to master >>> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> the merge of api_changes back into master for qtbase finally made it's >>>way >>> through the CI system. I'm currently in the process of merging >>>declarative >>> back and Kent is staging all the changes required to fix compilation of >>> the other modules. >>> >>> > From now on most changes should go to master. I'll keep api_changes >>>around >>> for another little while as there are still some changes in gerrit >>>against >>> it, but I would like to empty this queue now and then remove the >>> api_changes branch soon. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lars >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Development mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Development mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
