Am 17.04.2012 10:32, schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:23:20AM +0000, ext Anttila Janne wrote:
>> So is it ok to move checksdk to qtbase repo and src\tools folder? Or do you 
>> have better ideas for building it?
>>
> rather than just moving it around, you should do the right thing and
> integrate it into qmake, so it is able to produce self-contained
> makefiles which don't need messing with the environment.
> see also https://codereview.qt-project.org/15222

And where should the mapping between sdk and mkspec go to? Or does the
mkspec has then the sdk name in it?


> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


-- 
Andreas Holzammer | andreas.holzam...@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to