> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan <gir...@forwardbias.in> > wrote: > > 1. qtestlib ends up exposing qpa api and thus testcases might end up > > being binary incompatible - This should be fixed in > > AFAIK qtestlib doesn't promise binary compatibility (see e.g. > http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtqa/commit/0a67286dcc3513880dbbb01a72596b1e08741fea/diffs) > so I'm not sure if this actually needs fixing - but I'll leave that up > to the folks working on testlib :)
That's right, testlib isn't included in the BC promises (there's way too much code in testlib that gets inlined via macros and no use of Qt-style private classes), but should still maintain source-compatibility once 5.0.0 is out. That said, testlib shouldn't needlessly expose other private APIs, so it would be good to fix the issue with qpa properly. -- Jason McDonald QTestLib Maintainer _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
