On Sunday, April 15, 2012 19:30:55 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 15 de abril de 2012 23.59.55, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > On Friday, April 13, 2012 13:55:04 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > 4) Packagers who package only one type of Qt build (shared or > > > > static, > > > > but > > > > not both), should not see any changes either. One Qt build means > > > > a set of > > > > library files and the headers (e.g.: libQtCore.so and > > > > qconfig.h). > > > > > > THIS IS A PROPOSAL > > > > > > A static-and-shared build of Qt is currently not supported. There > > > are no plans to accomplish this with the current buildsystem in one > > > build.> > > Hmm, when I worked on the CMake buildsystem files, I thought > > static-and-shared was the default on Mac (or maybe it was Windows), or I > > had to support it for that reason. Has that changed or am I > > imagining/misremembering it? > > You may be confusing static-and-shared with debug-and-release. That's the > default on Mac and Windows.
Yes, you are correct. > > Static and shared in one build has never been supported. But you want to make it supported in one package? Has that been possible before? > It's far more likely that CMake and other buildsystems can accomplish this, > even if qmake can't. In order to do that, we need to have a sane qconfig.h > and export macros. That's what this proposal is about. Right. I might have to have another closer look at the proposal tomorrow then. A solution that works for qmake can probably be adapted anyway, as you note. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
