On 4/12/12 5:06 PM, "ext Oswald Buddenhagen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +0200, ext Stephen Kelly wrote: >> I'd like to see another model attempted next time, like all commits >> going to master, and a 'stable' branch which gets fast forwarded once >> a week >> >that's besides the point. people must work on the bleeding edge. >bic/sic changes just don't fare well with downstream (whichever >definition of that you apply), so they are diverted into a separate >branch. Yes, having a stable that's simply one week behind has no value. Then people could just as well not sync to the latest code base. Downstream projects (declarative is downstream from qtbase) need to be able to follow bleeding edge (e.g. in the CI). But you don't want to have to recompile the whole stack every two hours. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
