On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 09.53.29, aaron.kenn...@nokia.com wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/02/2012, at 9:44 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > > How big are the Qt Quick 1 language support classes? I'm asking so we can > > have an idea of how much maintenance effort those classes will be. I > > assume that they will continue to use V8, which will be continually > > updated and modified to support Qt Quick 2 and that introduces risk of > > regressions and breakages. > No. They would literally be copies of the 4.8 classes, so would rely on > QtScript and JSC and not V8.
That's even more work to be maintained. Are we prepared to do that?
How's the compatibility going so far? If they are using today the V8 engine, I
assume you've taken steps to keep compatibility issues limited. Why can't we
keep on using that?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
