On 30 January 2012 03:51, Rohan McGovern <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think it is a good idea. > Having errors with incremental builds which go away when you do a clean > build is one thing, but there are also some issues which _should_ > cause the build to fail, but don't if you only do incremental builds.
Thinking out loud - mad idea. Does anyone have (or knows how to extract from gerrit) stats about how many stages are requested on average during the week? Would it be possible to do incremental builds when the one sub-repository is "more active", and full builds otherwise (with patches that are merged in if and only if they pass the full build)? For instance, if qtbase is more active during CET working hours, one could think of having incremental builds from 8.00-12.00 and 15.00-18.00, with a full build at 12.00 (~3h, till 15.00) and other full builds starting at 18.00 and going on overnight? -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
