> On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Yuri Pankov <[email protected]> wrote: > 6713 is somewhat more involved, I've tried to use the wording from the 4390 > fix and describe the current (ie, with the tunable being unset) behavior, but > most likely it could be improved.
+background destroy operations will continue to free the space, without leaks. Maybe “will continue to free the leaked space”? (assuming the “leaked” value that recovers will shift to the “freeing” property value) — Chris Josephes ------------------------------------------- openzfs-developer Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=28015062-f966d51c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
