Hi, Been a while I did not reply to this thread but lots of progress has been done in the mean time.
We understand it is a pretty disruptive append to the code base but at least it is not IMHO introduce disruptive changes. We are closed to the final step now, all commands have been implemented using two formats (json and ldjson), schemas descriptions are online (including orderly), we regularly push new rebase to help code review... So now we just need some love :) or in other words, we need to know if you guys (OpenZFS community) agree and get buy on the fundamental approach and give their approval for merging our code ? Details and code are on github : https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/3938 For infos (output and format...), see : https://github.com/Alyseo/zfs/tree/json-0.6.5/json BTW, we follow and like #3907 : Initial stable API + ClusterHQ libzfs_core extensions + various fixes <https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/3907> We have different approaches but I strongly think that both can be very complementary and can co-exist since they serve slightly different roles. To help code review and these two importants pull requests, maybe we can help each others on code review ? Richard, let me know what you think about it and if it can helps ? Regards, Yacine
_______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
