> On Aug. 4, 2015, 1:14 a.m., Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> > I don't think this is really the direction we want to go with 
> > libzfs_core.c; it increases the complexity of the operation and the 
> > possible error cases.  That said, I understand why you want to do it since 
> > otherwise there's no way to set the name based on the BEGIN record, using 
> > libzfs_core.  Maybe the existing lzc_receive is just the wrong interface, 
> > and it should take the BEGIN record as an argument, forcing the caller to 
> > read and decode it (and decide on the name based on it, if desired).  We 
> > could then provide a convenience routine that works like the current 
> > lzc_receive().
> > 
> > What do you think?

After our converation on the mailing list I am withdrawing this request and I 
will create a new one for the approach that you suggested.


- Andriy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/232/#review761
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 15, 2015, 2:36 p.m., Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.csiden.org/r/232/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 15, 2015, 2:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for OpenZFS Developer Mailing List and Matthew Ahrens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 6051
>     https://www.illumos.org/issues/6051
> 
> 
> Repository: illumos-gate
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> lzc_receive: add a possibility to take the snapshot name from the stream
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   usr/src/lib/libzfs_core/common/libzfs_core.c 
> 22af0f4a7a9fd8ab15cc7880233ba51274ce87d8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.csiden.org/r/232/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ZoL, FreeBSD
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andriy Gapon
> 
>

_______________________________________________
developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Reply via email to