On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 3:18 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 6:17 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> the m68k, sh, and sparc64 build fails with GCC 14 due to: >> > > Two of those are scheduled to be removed after we branch 6. > > So only the m68k really matters. More below. > >> >> make "CC_FOR_BUILD=gcc" "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -m4-single-only" "CCASFLAGS=-g >> -O2 -m4-single-only" "CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD=" "CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=" >> "INSTALL=/usr/bin/install -c" "LDFLAGS=-m4-single-only" >> "LIBCFLAGS=-m4-single-only" "LIBCFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=" "MAKE=make" >> "MAKEINFO=makeinfo --split-size=5000000 " "PICFLAG=" >> "PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET=" "SHELL=/bin/sh" "EXPECT=expect" "RUNTEST=runtest" >> "RUNTESTFLAGS=" "exec_prefix=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6" >> "infodir=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/share/info" >> "libdir=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/lib" "prefix=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6" >> "tooldir=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6" >> "top_toollibdir=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/lib/m4-single-only" >> "AR=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/bin/ar" "AS=as" >> "CC=/tmp/sh/b-gcc-sh-rtems6/./gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/sh/b-gcc-sh-rtems6/./gcc/ >> -nostdinc -B/tmp/sh/b-gcc-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/m4-single-only/newlib/ >> -isystem >> /tmp/sh/b-gcc-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/m4-single-only/newlib/targ-include >> -isystem /home/EB/sebastian_h/src/gcc/newlib/libc/include >> -B/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/bin/ >> -B/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/lib/ -isystem >> /tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/include -isystem >> /tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/sys-include -m4-single-only" "LD=ld" >> "LIBCFLAGS=-m4-single-only" "NM=" "PICFLAG=" >> "RANLIB=/tmp/sh/i-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/bin/ranlib" "DESTDIR=" all-am >> make[4]: Entering directory >> '/tmp/sh/b-gcc-sh-rtems6/sh-rtems6/m4-single-only/newlib' >> CC libm/complex/libm_a-ccoshl.o >> /home/EB/sebastian_h/src/gcc/newlib/libm/complex/ccoshl.c: In function >> 'ccoshl': >> /home/EB/sebastian_h/src/gcc/newlib/libm/complex/ccoshl.c:43:13: error: >> implicit declaration of function 'coshl'; did you mean 'coshf'? >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> 43 | w = coshl(x) * cosl(y) + (sinhl(x) * sinl(y)) * I; >> | ^~~~~ >> | coshf >> /home/EB/sebastian_h/src/gcc/newlib/libm/complex/ccoshl.c:43:24: error: >> implicit declaration of function 'cosl'; did you mean 'cosf'? >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> 43 | w = coshl(x) * cosl(y) + (sinhl(x) * sinl(y)) * I; >> | ^~~~ >> | cosf >> /home/EB/sebastian_h/src/gcc/newlib/libm/complex/ccoshl.c:43:35: error: >> implicit declaration of function 'sinhl'; did you mean 'sinhf'? >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> 43 | w = coshl(x) * cosl(y) + (sinhl(x) * sinl(y)) * I; >> | ^~~~~ >> | sinhf >> /home/EB/sebastian_h/src/gcc/newlib/libm/complex/ccoshl.c:43:46: error: >> implicit declaration of function 'sinl'; did you mean 'sinf'? >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> 43 | w = coshl(x) * cosl(y) + (sinhl(x) * sinl(y)) * I; >> | ^~~~ >> | sinf >> make[4]: *** [Makefile:43178: libm/complex/libm_a-ccoshl.o] Error 1 >> >> Implicit function declarations are an error by default in GCC 14. Joel, >> could you please have a look at the long double support in Newlib since >> you worked with it some time ago. >> > > Looks like a file that probably should be disabled on targets without > long double support. I'll try to dig into it. > I have a build with a gcc version that has this as a warning but duplicates the underlying issue. I'll see what I can do. > > Please file an RSB issue once we get to gitlab. I think that's where these > type of issues go now since it is gcc. > >> >> -- >> embedded brains GmbH & Co. KG >> Herr Sebastian HUBER >> Dornierstr. 4 >> 82178 Puchheim >> Germany >> email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 >> fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 >> >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München >> Registernummer: HRB 157899 >> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler >> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: >> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ >> >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
