Dear Kinsey,
sry for the stupid question. What is the correct way to reference the issue
[#4981 <https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4981> rtems6 - v1 05/16] FIX: Add
missing default case
or
[PATCH rtems6 - v1 05/16] #4981 <https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4981>
FIX: Add missing default case
?
On 04.01.2024 19:48, Kinsey Moore wrote:
All of the patches here need an issue reference. Beyond that, this
patch is good to go in. I'm still reviewing the remainder of the set
and I'll leave the renaming discussion to Aaron.
Kinsey
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:35 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Bernd Moessner <[email protected]>
---
cpukit/dev/flash/flashdev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/dev/flash/flashdev.c b/cpukit/dev/flash/flashdev.c
index 27edead968..8bd3d11246 100644
--- a/cpukit/dev/flash/flashdev.c
+++ b/cpukit/dev/flash/flashdev.c
@@ -390,6 +390,8 @@ static int rtems_flashdev_ioctl(
case RTEMS_FLASHDEV_IOCTL_GET_WRITE_BLOCK_SIZE:
err = rtems_flashdev_ioctl_get_write_block_size( flash, arg );
break;
+ default:
+ err = EINVAL;
}
rtems_flashdev_release( flash );
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
