On 16/12/2023 2:04 am, Cedric Berger wrote: > Hello Heinz, > > On 15.12.2023 10:44, Heinz Junkes wrote: >> HI, >> I can follow Cedric's reasoning. Even if I was the initiator of this >> discussion. >> >> I use RTEMS in my lectures/exercises, among other things, and have always >> been >> able to give the students >> freedom which laptops with which OS they wanted to use. And there are many of >> them with used >> older laptops. Intel Macs, for example. >> >> But you can also use a VM with Linux on all these systems. >> >> It might then be okay to communicate openly that there will be no more >> support >> for Macs in the future. > > Just to be clear: I'm not advocating dropping Mac support, just dropping the > support for the old intel-based ones (the ones with issues right now). > > Mac with M1/M2/M3 work fine with the latest tooling.
I think there is a middle ground here and that means some investigation is needed to determine what works and what is at issue then deciding how much further work is done. I have done some of this. The results are based on what I have working: Builds: Sonoma Montery Big Sur Fails: Ventura The failure on Ventura is in GMP called from MPFR. Running the GMP tests a number fail and removing --disable-shared improves the test results but GCC does not build. I have not looked any further. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel