On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 5:27 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > On 6/7/2023 4:21 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > OK I will prepare something soon. I have my WIP version at > > https://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/tree/_clang-format?h=test-reformat > > > > I think the format file itself should be just about stable. I will > > make one more test and check of it within the next few days, and then > > send the patch hopefully early next week. > > How will the version of clang-format we need be handled? > > Will an older version complain if our style is used with it? I am concerned I > use and trust the output however I make a mistake and use an old clang-format > that does not generate the correct format. I doubt I would spot that happening > when reviewing the output. > Certain (new) options in the style file will/can trigger an error that terminates the reformatting in (older) versions of clang-format that don't support the given option. I think we would be in that territory with our style.
> Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
