How hard are the microblaze patches going to be to apply? On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:19 PM Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:58 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about >>> the tool versions for the release. >>> >>> For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2: >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-June/241838.html >>> >>> In GCC 12 a big change was enabling the vectorization support with -O2. >>> This should have stabilized in GCC 13. GCC 13 contains some >>> RTEMS-specific improvements for Ada. >>> >> >> I think I am generally ok with moving to 13.2 since we want to be >> reasonably >> current when the branch happens. >> >> Do you know of any Ada users with Adacore support for GNAT/RTEMS? >> I am aware of one case and they are using GCC 11 as a base so we already >> have a mismatch. The user builds RSB tools with TLS disabled for >> compatibility. >> I know this isn't a community concern but if we have more Ada users, we >> want to do >> right by them. >> >> I also was asked about using FORTRAN recently. >> >> I'd like to say the same thing about Rust users. :) >> >>> >>> For Binutils and GDB I would just use the latest release available at >>> the RTEMS 6 branch point. >>> >> > Be aware that I have recently rolled 6.1 binutils back from 2.40 to 2.39 > due to a regression in the AArch64 toolchain. The latest release is still > 2.40, so please don't roll that forward until the 2.41 release is out and > is verified to have the fix. > > Kinsey > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sincerely, Sam Price
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
