On 25/5/2023 3:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 25.05.23 03:40, Kinsey Moore wrote:> Is there any reason this isn't just > being moved to a shared directory if >> they're all being made identical? > > Initially, they were all identical. We already have a shared implementation > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/include/rtems/score/cpustdatomic.h > > The CPU port specific <rtems/score/cpuatomic.h> allows a custom implementation > if needed. I would keep this ability. >
Why not just add the file back if it is needed when it is needed and then remove it once it is not? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
