On 9/3/2023 1:54 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I've followed the discussion with gdb and this is ok.
Thanks. > I still question them > installing that header file. The the patch you're adding fixes it by making > local includes ahead. But I don't remember seeing an answer to the question of > should the header file be installed anyway. It is kind of awkward to sort out. I think there will be skews in versions when installed binutils and gdb vary in age. I suppose it depends on how often the file changes? I wonder how the package managers handle the clash if binutils and gdb both install and package it? > Ok to push I will push it once I finish some more testing. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
