OK and thanks.
Should this be fixed on 5 as well? If you think so consider it OK as well.
Thanks
Chris
On 29/9/2022 7:12 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> The second allocation check was mistakenly rechecking the first
> allocation. It now checks the correct allocation and ensures that names
> is not NULL.
>
> Updates #4462
> ---
> cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c
> b/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c
> index 7dd2bc1047..1d3b82ae29 100644
> --- a/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c
> +++ b/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ rtems_fdt_init_index (rtems_fdt_handle* fdt,
> rtems_fdt_blob* blob)
> }
>
> names = calloc(1, total_name_memory);
> - if (!entries)
> + if (!names)
> {
> free(entries);
> return -RTEMS_FDT_ERR_NO_MEMORY;
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
