I realized that I am not using the latest rtems, so I did not see those BSPs.
Should I create another patch to add the correct BSPs?
Thanks,
Duc
________________________________
From: devel <devel-boun...@rtems.org> on behalf of Kinsey Moore
<kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 12:52:15 PM
To: devel@rtems.org <devel@rtems.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v3 1/7] lwip.py: Change arch and bsp check method
On 9/8/2022 11:34, Duc Doan wrote:
> ---
> lwip.py | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lwip.py b/lwip.py
> index 84eef2c..1f0b8e2 100644
> --- a/lwip.py
> +++ b/lwip.py
> @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ def build(bld):
> drv_incl = []
> arch_lib_path = rtems.arch_bsp_lib_path(bld.env.RTEMS_VERSION,
> bld.env.RTEMS_ARCH_BSP)
...
> is_qemu = False
> - if bld.env.RTEMS_ARCH_BSP.startswith('aarch64-rtems6-xilinx_zynqmp'):
> + if arch == 'aarch64' and bsp in ['xilinx_zynqmp_ultra96']:
> is_xilinx_bsp = True
> is_aarch64_bsp = True
> - if bld.env.RTEMS_ARCH_BSP.endswith('_qemu'):
> + if bsp in ['xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu']:
> is_qemu = True
> if is_xilinx_bsp:
> drv_incl.extend(xilinx_drv_incl)
The BSPs mentioned here for AArch64 are actually ARM BSPs. The proper
set of BSPs to be used here are:
xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_qemu
xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_zu3eg
xilinx_zynqmp_ilp32_qemu
xilinx_zynqmp_ilp32_zu3eg
At some point, the lwIP build needs to get better about managing which BSPs it
supports, but that's not a task for you here and now.
Kinsey
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
