On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 8:27 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 8/9/2022 9:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 4:47 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org > > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > > > On 8/9/2022 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Do these references to the ilp32 need to be removed? > > > > > > rtems-tools]$ grep -r ilp32 | grep versal > > > config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini: xilinx_versal_ilp32_qemu, > > > xilinx_versal_ilp32_vck190, > > > config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini: xilinx_versal_ilp32_qemu, > > xilinx_versal_lp64_qemu, > > > config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini:bsps_aarch64 = > xilinx_versal_ilp32_vck190, > > > > Yes they do. Could the BSP builder ask `rtems-bsps` for the list > these days? > > That would help avoid this issue. > > > > Yes. For "all" but not for the tiers. But all is what is used by the OAR > > builders so that would be an improvement and avoid patches like this and > the > > next one which updates the RSB to use a new rtems-tools hash > > Could the tier status be added to the spec files and reported by > rtems-bsps? >
It's software. Anything is possible. Lol It would be better stored in RTEMS and the rtems-bsps tool could then show it > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
