On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 6:47 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On 18/8/2022 7:23 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I think the wrong bus.h must be being included somewhere. These are > static > > inline methods on the i386. Hopefully a simple patch for someone who > knows what > > to do: > > Could it be installed with the BSP? Does it happen with a clean prefix? > Possible but no cookie for you today. It was a clean install and there is no bus.h in the install location. In fact, there is no file named bus.h in the rtems/ source tree. Kinsey suggested this was all a subtle matter of the order of include directories when building but not knowing the right answer didn't let us pursue that idea. The i386 seems to have a unique bus.h I was remembering you battled this not so long ago and was sincerely hoping you would spot what was wrong. --joel > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
