If I read the patch set correctly, there is a one line change to os-rtems.h which looks fine and the rest is updating to the latest version.
If so, then push it. --joel On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 3:21 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/VERSION | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/VERSION > b/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/VERSION > index 7d9c9f41b2..b13bed5750 100644 > --- a/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/VERSION > +++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/VERSION > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ > -This directory contains a port of the JFFS2 file system from Linux v4.17. > +This directory contains a port of the JFFS2 file system from Linux v5.9. > > To update to a newer Linux version use this command in a Git clone of > Linux to > generate the relevant patches: > > - git format-patch v4.17..v9.99 -- > + git format-patch v5.9..v9.99 -- > include/uapi/linux/jffs2.h \ > fs/jffs2/LICENCE \ > fs/jffs2/acl.h \ > -- > 2.35.3 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
