On 27.05.22 10:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Gabriel,

the uniprocessor version uses an optimization at the reader side:

#if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
     } while (gen == 0 || gen != th->th_generation);
#else
     } while (gen != th->th_generation);
#endif

This is possible since the windup happens with interrupts disabled. I guess you need this optimization somewhere in the PPS/NTP code.

Could you please add the details to the commit message and not the cover letter. The cover letter is not committed.

Could you please have a look at:

https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2022-May/071609.html

It would be also good to have a test case for the problem you are trying to fix. The PPS/NTP code is a bit complicated and the test coverage of this area is far below the score average.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to