On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:27 AM Frank Kuehndel < frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> From: Frank Kühndel <frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> > > Hello, > > I want to extend the code of `libtftpfs` to support newer RFCs to > increase the file download speed. This raises the question of the > license of the involved source files. The current state is that > the file headers are old. The code originates from W. Eric Norum. > > Fortunately, I found in ticket #3053 a general permission of > Eric Norum to change the code to BSD-2. My question here is: > > Shall I use the chance to modernize the headers of the libtftpfs > files as suggested in this patch or shall I keep the original file > headers intact? > Please make them follow the current coding conventions. As to give another example of why putting physical addresses in header files is a bad idea, that has not been Eric's location for well over a decade. --joel > > Thanks and greetings > Frank > > Frank Kühndel (1): > libtftpfs: Change to BSD-2-Clause license > > cpukit/include/rtems/tftp.h | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ > cpukit/libfs/src/ftpfs/tftpDriver.c | 44 ++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.34.1 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
