This patch also needs to go upstream to GCC? Has the one for the init symbol been submitted to GCC?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022, 12:56 PM Alex White <alex.wh...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > This fixes compilation errors in rtems-libbsd. > --- > rtems/config/tools/rtems-xilinx-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-xilinx-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg > b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-xilinx-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg > index a83fe46..5366457 100644 > --- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-xilinx-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg > +++ b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-xilinx-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg > @@ -44,3 +44,6 @@ > > %patch add gcc -p1 > https://devel.rtems.org/raw-attachment/ticket/4481/0002-config-microblaze-crti.S-Add-single-underscore-init-.patch > %hash sha512 > 0002-config-microblaze-crti.S-Add-single-underscore-init-.patch > bf1ec7eff0dd51d154dd0507edb085458c90a000f5a3ccefb1064147cf8fdafe0111d2094372e164976f2193c289bff9ea63dcad43555c90893272a494b7e779 > + > +%patch add gcc -p1 > https://devel.rtems.org/raw-attachment/ticket/4589/0001-microblaze-Define-__ELF__-for-RTEMS-target.patch > +%hash sha512 0001-microblaze-Define---ELF---for-RTEMS-target.patch > 39c0666c2e5c560447f00ed913cd07261e9c0db05b0cc549400667013ccf1d4140c0bd7b012d60dd628235bf7ae27564460a45e969e9cff75d14ed94bfd82632 > -- > 2.30.2 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
