On 9/12/21 6:47 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote: > Hello Chris, > > sorry that I haven't been clear enough. > > 1. The ticket #4552 that I created before sending the patch to the list and > that > was closed by the patch was for 5. > > 2. I asked as an answer to Joels review and I understood him that he is OK > with > that change: > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-December/070092.html > > and > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-December/070093.html
Again sorry I missed this when I brushed over the emails. > > Do you want me to revert that patch on 5? > It does change the expected functionality and we should be careful about doing that. It is not clear if someone has relied on it working this way as a cheap way to detect an overwrite. I am fine on RTEMS 6 because of the upgrade and a ticket in the release notes covering the change however if it breaks in a dot release then that is a different issue. Given it is in maybe we let it sit and it there is feedback we come back and take another look? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
