On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 10:19 AM Christian Mauderer <o...@c-mauderer.de> wrote:
> Hello, > > in a discussion with Husni I noted that the patches adding ttcp are only > on the 6-freebsd-12 branch of libbsd. Is there a reason that they are > not on master too? > Yes but forgetting isn't a good reason. I know I have a recent patch so apps using C99 or C++03 can compile using libbsd missing also. I will survey OAR and make sure we catch up. Is there any reason rtemsbsd/ just shouldn't be the same? > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=af06b267c5ce04e8a4a7719cb0c723ee4a27f4b4 > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=7960ab7a43d5a7c6ceccdd67f8e379adfce7a633 > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=6cc63cbe657c3ee664727cce1a54acc7e7b5fe9d > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=8dfea31d729fafab69b5cf1846598f5104b0faeb > > Background for the question: I expect that an update to FreeBSD 13 will > use only what is on the master branch. That's basically what master is > for: Tracking the development to keep up with new stuff in FreeBSD and > make it easy to jump to the next FreeBSD release. In other words: I > think a (possible future) 6-freebsd-13 branch will be based on master > and not on 6-freebsd-12. Am I wrong with that assumption? > > Again: please correct me if I'm wrong but with that in mind I would say > that it is a good idea to port to master and 6-freebsd-12 or (for > experimental stuff) only to master. But not only to 6-freebsd-12. > > Best regards > > Christian >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
