On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want > > this code... > > The main issue is the bad chip design. If we don't have this code, we > can't test the extended interrupts. In production, you want tested code. >
ok, thanks. My comments are all pretty minor, except for the terminology issues of "cause" but that wording already exists. post the v2 series, but I probably won't review it and you can check it in if no one complains. It's up to you if you want to work a different wording than "cause" -- I prefer "raise" _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
