On 7/6/2021 18:55, Chris Johns wrote:
On 7/7/21 5:46 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
This is an alternate patch to solve the issue of test-related information being
included in an installed application-targeted header.
Why is the ZYNQMP different to the zync BSP? I have been running the tests on
the zynq for years and the CGEM hard IP is also almost the same.
As I said in the other thread I have lost the reason for needing this special
case for the ZYNQMP.
The need for the difference on ZynqMP is that there are 4 different CGEM
interfaces of which dev boards primarily make use of CGEM3. I have a
custom board in hand that uses CGEM2 which I can't run the network tests
on without modifying nexus-devices.h manually. Zynq7000 boards that use
CGEM1 instead of CGEM0 could make use of the same mechanism for testing.
Kinsey
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
