On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:16 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
<zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>
> I tried to do some testing with the code I write. I tired to test it by
> making a rtems app. I modified the code from the ubuntu manpage ( here
> https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man2/timer_create.2.html)so it
> does not need command line arguments and my code was able to compile. When I
> run the program it does not print anything. I double-checked the POSIX calls
> and all were compatible with rtems.
>
The easiest thing to do is to modify an existing test to add new test
cases, or else copy a test that is similar to what you need to do.
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On Saturday, June 19th, 2021 at 6:49 PM, zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> <zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>
> > I have added the tests and added the ones that create the timer. My idea
> > for testing is that if I change the wall clock and I'll check the monotonic
> > clock's time. But I think I have to make a signal and arm the timer.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Zack
> >
> > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> >
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >
> > On Friday, June 18th, 2021 at 8:01 AM, Christian Mauderer
> > o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Zack,
> > >
> > > On 18/06/2021 04:34, zack_on_the_speed_chanel wrote:
> > >
> > > > so I tested it with the but I have not made a new test file I'll do
> > > > that soon. How do I add a new test? All the tests that test the timer
> > > > functionality do work. I"m confident that all the changes I had to made
> > > > to implement a monotonic clock should be there.
> > >
> > > Regarding a new test: Just grep for example for psxtimer01 in the
> > >
> > > sources and add the new test simmilar to the existing one.
> > >
> > > The most relevant files are spec/build/testsuites/psxtests/*.yml for the
> > >
> > > waf based build system and testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am and
> > >
> > > .../configure.ac for the old build system.
> > >
> > > But please check whether you need a new test program. If you basically
> > >
> > > only copy the test routine of psxtimer01 or psxtimer02 and replace all
> > >
> > > CLOCK_REALTIME by CLOCK_MONOTONIC then you shouldn't add a new test.
> > >
> > > Instead create a function in the test that is called once with
> > >
> > > CLOCK_REALTIME and once with CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
> > >
> > > Please make sure that the test not only tests the API but also whether
> > >
> > > the timer work as expected. A timer with CLOCK_REALTIME can be affected
> > >
> > > by changes in the wall clock. CLOCK_MONOTONIC should not be affected. So
> > >
> > > please make sure that your test checks whether that is really the case.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Christian
> > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Zack
> > > >
> > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > >
> > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, June 15th, 2021 at 7:29 AM, Christian Mauderer
> > > > o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If you add a new functionallity you should add a test that tests the
> > > > >
> > > > > expected behaviour. You just shouldn't replace one but add a new test
> > > > > or
> > > > >
> > > > > a new test case to an existing test.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Christian
> > > > >
> > > > > On 14/06/2021 22:18, zack_on_the_speed_chanel wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > also i'll revert the posix test that I changed back to normal
> > > > > > because it was only for testing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, June 14th, 2021 at 8:14 PM, zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> > > > > > zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've made most of the corrections to the code. I fixed up the
> > > > > > > formatting but I still don't know if I have to add anything for
> > > > > > > the settime and delete_timer(). i assume as the monotonic clock
> > > > > > > only affects the value I think it's all I have to do. I also can
> > > > > > > try to modify a posix test to check my theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Zack
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Saturday, June 12th, 2021 at 9:31 AM, Christian Mauderer
> > > > > > > o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello Zack,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't really know a lot about the timer toppic. So this is
> > > > > > > > more of a
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > style and general suggestion review.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 09/06/2021 20:27, zack wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: zack zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h | 6 ++-
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 5 +-
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c | 26 +++++++---
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h
> > > > > > > > > b/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > index bcbf07a65a..f8cf6115b2 100644
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #include <rtems/score/objectdata.h>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #include <rtems/score/watchdog.h>
> > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think the blank line separated rtems includes from others. So
> > > > > > > > please
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > don't remove it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +#include <time.h>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #include <pthread.h>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #ifdef __cplusplus
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -47,7 +47,9 @@ typedef struct {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > struct itimerspec timer_data; /* Timing data of the timer /
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > uint32_t ticks; / Number of ticks of the initialization /
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > uint32_t overrun; / Number of expirations of the timer */
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - struct timespec time; /* Time at which the timer was
> > > > > > > > > started */
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - struct timespec time; /* Time at which the timer was
> > > > > > > > > started */
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Not sure what changed in that line. Looks like a whitespace
> > > > > > > > change.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please avoid these.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - clockid_t clock_type;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why a blank line?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > } POSIX_Timer_Control;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > /**
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c
> > > > > > > > > b/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > index a63cf1d100..e78c359bd5 100644
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- a/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int timer_create(
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > POSIX_Timer_Control *ptimer;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - if ( clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME )
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - if ( clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME || clock_id !=
> > > > > > > > > CLOCK_MONOTONIC )
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Not sure about that one. It's allways a bit difficult whith
> > > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > constructions but I think this one is allways true and
> > > > > > > > therefore will
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > allways return an error.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let's assume clock_id is CLOCK_MONOTONIC. In that case
> > > > > > > > (clock_id !=
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > CLOCK_REALTIME) is true which means that the function will
> > > > > > > > return with
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > an error. The same works for CLOCK_RREALTIME and the second
> > > > > > > > condition.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you apply De Morgan to the term you see that
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME || clock_id != CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is the same as
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > !(clock_id == CLOCK_REALTIME && clock_id == CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The two inner comparisons are exclusive. So that won't work.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What you most likely want is a
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > !(clock_id == CLOCK_REALTIME || clock_id == CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > or with De Morgan again:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME && clock_id != CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > if ( !timerid )
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ int timer_create(
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ptimer->timer_data.it_value.tv_nsec = 0;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ptimer->timer_data.it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ptimer->timer_data.it_interval.tv_nsec = 0;
> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - ptimer->clock_type=clock_id;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - _Watchdog_Preinitialize( &ptimer->Timer,
> > > > > > > > > _Per_CPU_Get_snapshot() );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _Watchdog_Initialize( &ptimer->Timer, _POSIX_Timer_TSR );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _Objects_Open_u32(&_POSIX_Timer_Information,
> > > > > > > > > &ptimer->Object, 0);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c
> > > > > > > > > b/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > index ee2a566f0e..62011cde58 100644
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- a/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #include <rtems/score/todimpl.h>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #include <rtems/score/watchdogimpl.h>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #include <rtems/seterr.h>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +#include <rtems/timespec.h>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - - When a timer is initialized, the
> > > > > > > > > value of the time in
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -43,21 +44,67 @@ int timer_gettime(
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > POSIX_Timer_Control *ptimer;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ISR_lock_Context lock_context;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - uint64_t now;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > uint32_t remaining;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Per_CPU_Control *cpu;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - struct timespec * now; // get time now
> > > > > > > > > either with
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - struct timespec * expire; // expire
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - struct timespec * result;// get remaining
> > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > if ( !value )
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ptimer = _POSIX_Timer_Get( timerid, &lock_context );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - if ( ptimer != NULL ) {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Per_CPU_Control *cpu;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - if(ptimer== NULL ){
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Style: There should be a space before the ==
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > > > > > > > > - }
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +if ( ptimer->clock_type ==CLOCK_REALTIME) {
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Style again: Space after ==
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why that many blank lines?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - cpu = _POSIX_Timer_Acquire_critical( ptimer,
> > > > > > > > > &lock_context );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - _TOD_Get(now); // get current time
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - rtems_timespec_from_ticks
> > > > > > > > > (ptimer->Timer.expire,expire ); // get the time to expire
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That are C++ style comments. We normally have C-Style comments
> > > > > > > > in RTEMS
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > only. Beneath that the comments exceed the line length. And
> > > > > > > > some of them
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > are quite superflous. A _TOD_Get(now) doesn't need any comment.
> > > > > > > > The line
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is already telling that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Again: Blank lines. I won't mention the further blank lines
> > > > > > > > below!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - if (now->tv_nsec+now->tv_sec >
> > > > > > > > > expire->tv_nsec+expire->tv_sec) { // check if the time expired
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - rtems_timespec_subtract (now ,expire ,
> > > > > > > > > result); //
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Empty comment at the end of the line?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - remaining = (uint32_t)
> > > > > > > > > result->tv_nsec+result->tv_sec;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - } else {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - remaining = 0;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - }
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - _Timespec_From_ticks( remaining, &value->it_value );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - value->it_interval = ptimer->timer_data.it_interval;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - _POSIX_Timer_Release( cpu, &lock_context );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - }
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +if ( ptimer->clock_type ==CLOCK_MONOTONIC) {
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Odd indentation and missing blank before the closing bracket.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Indentation and some blanks on brackets seems to be a problem
> > > > > > > > on quite
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > some more lines too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - cpu = _POSIX_Timer_Acquire_critical( ptimer,
> > > > > > > > > &lock_context );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - now = cpu->Watchdog.ticks;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - _Timecounter_Nanouptime(now );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - rtems_timespec_from_ticks
> > > > > > > > > (ptimer->Timer.expire,expire );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - if (now->tv_nsec+now->tv_sec >
> > > > > > > > > expire->tv_nsec+expire->tv_sec) {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - rtems_timespec_subtract (now, expire,
> > > > > > > > > result);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - if ( now < ptimer->Timer.expire ) {
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - remaining = (uint32_t) (
> > > > > > > > > ptimer->Timer.expire - now );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - remaining = (uint32_t)
> > > > > > > > > result->tv_nsec+result->tv_sec;
> > > > > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > > > > remaining = 0;
> > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
> > > > > > > > > b/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > index 9f79d33c42..029e638c76 100644
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- a/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -59,17 +59,31 @@ void *POSIX_Init (
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad clock
> > > > > > > > > id" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > puts( "timer_create - bad timer id pointer - EINVAL" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_REALTIME, &event, NULL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &event, NULL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad
> > > > > > > > > timer id" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It seems that you replace the test for REALTIME timers. Are
> > > > > > > > they no
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > longer supported with your changes? I'm not sure whether that
> > > > > > > > is a good
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > idea because it would break all existing applications that use
> > > > > > > > REALTIME
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > timer.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > puts( "timer_create - OK" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_REALTIME, NULL, &timer );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > posix_service_failed( status, "timer_create OK" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > puts( "timer_create - too many - EAGAIN" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_REALTIME, NULL, &timer1 );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer1 );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EAGAIN, "too
> > > > > > > > > many" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - puts( "timer_create (monotonic) - bad timer id pointer -
> > > > > > > > > EINVAL" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &event, NULL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad
> > > > > > > > > timer id" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - puts( "timer_create (Monotonic) - OK" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - posix_service_failed( status, "timer_create OK" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - puts( "timer_create (monotonic)- too many - EAGAIN" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer1 );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EAGAIN, "too
> > > > > > > > > many" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - puts( "timer_delete - bad id - EINVAL" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > status = timer_delete( timer1 + 1 );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad
> > > > > > > > > id" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -100,14 +114,14 @@ void *POSIX_Init (
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > status = timer_settime( timer, TIMER_ABSTIME, &itimer,
> > > > > > > > > NULL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad
> > > > > > > > > itimer value #2" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - clock_gettime( CLOCK_REALTIME, &now );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - clock_gettime( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &now );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > itimer.it_value = now;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > itimer.it_value.tv_sec = itimer.it_value.tv_sec - 1;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > puts( "timer_settime - bad itimer value - previous time -
> > > > > > > > > EINVAL" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > status = timer_settime( timer, TIMER_ABSTIME, &itimer,
> > > > > > > > > NULL );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad
> > > > > > > > > itimer value #3" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - clock_gettime( CLOCK_REALTIME, &now );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - clock_gettime( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &now );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > itimer.it_value = now;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > itimer.it_value.tv_sec = itimer.it_value.tv_sec + 1;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > puts( "timer_settime - bad id - EINVAL" );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -129,4 +143,4 @@ void *POSIX_Init (
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > TEST_END();
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > rtems_test_exit (0);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -}
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > \ No newline at end of file
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > devel mailing list
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > devel@rtems.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
