ok
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 7:06 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > --- > c-user/task/directives.rst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/c-user/task/directives.rst b/c-user/task/directives.rst > index 2bfb8af..c0ef4e7 100644 > --- a/c-user/task/directives.rst > +++ b/c-user/task/directives.rst > @@ -1702,12 +1702,32 @@ This directive sets the :term:`home scheduler` to the > scheduler specified by > ``scheduler_id``. > > :c:macro:`RTEMS_INVALID_PRIORITY` > - There task priority specified in ``priority`` was invalid with respect to > - the scheduler specified by ``scheduler_id``. > + The task priority specified by ``priority`` was invalid with respect to > the > + scheduler specified by ``scheduler_id``. > > :c:macro:`RTEMS_INVALID_ID` > There was no task associated with the identifier specified by > ``task_id``. > > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_RESOURCE_IN_USE` > + The task specified by ``task_id`` was enqueued on a :term:`wait queue`. > + > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_RESOURCE_IN_USE` > + The task specified by ``task_id`` had a :term:`current priority` which > + consisted of more than the :term:`real priority`. > + > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_RESOURCE_IN_USE` > + The task specified by ``task_id`` had a :term:`helping scheduler`. > + > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_RESOURCE_IN_USE` > + The task specified by ``task_id`` was pinned. > + > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_UNSATISFIED` > + The scheduler specified by ``scheduler_id`` owned no processor. > + > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_UNSATISFIED` > + The scheduler specified by ``scheduler_id`` did not support the affinity > + set of the task specified by ``task_id``. > + > :c:macro:`RTEMS_ILLEGAL_ON_REMOTE_OBJECT` > The task resided on a remote node. > > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel