On 22/04/2021 14:17, Robin Müller wrote:
It worked for me. Can you specify that? The overflow check would have
to be implemented by an upper layer, right?
I can adapt my former patch using the tick solution to do the
multiplication first if this is better.
If you call HAL_GetTick() when the clock tick is 0xffffabcd and then
0x123 and you calculate the difference of the results, the value should
be all right. I am not sure if this is the case if you calculate it by
rtems_clock_get_ticks_since_boot() * 1000) /
rtems_clock_get_ticks_per_second()
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
