On 16/4/21 3:28 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/04/2021 22:58, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> I guess we should define something to add here? Is anything written >> somewhere we can adopt? > the spirit of the Python guide is to have rules which are enforced by tools.
I see a guide as a means to provide robust and portable code in a common style where we document and learn from our experiences. Any forced line like needing a tool would create an artificial barrier where needed rules are not added because we do not have a tool. I doubt any of us would want that to happen. > If > a certain component should run on platform X, then I think some CI system > should > be in place which runs the test suite on platform X. This is hard to do, costs money and is only as good as a tests. It is important but we should also use reviews as a way to catch issues. >> Was this considered at all under the pre-qual effort (which stimulated >> these guidelines in the first place)? Do we have a Windows blind spot >> in our Python code bases? > The Python modules in rtems-central should run on Windows, however, I never > tested this. A random pick of a file and a brief scan ... https://git.rtems.org/rtems-central/tree/rtemsspec/interface.py#n313 For generating code it is important to make sure you use the platform's line separator or git will get upset. :) Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
