> On Apr 15, 2021, at 08:55 , Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
> 
> No one has posted publicly about these in 5 days and asking privately a
> group of mvme users, I only got feedback from Heinz
> 
> ==============
> I can only note that we have some (many) users who would like to stay at the 
> fixed 9600 baud because that is what
> they have been used to since "forever”.
> I had received feedback on the MVME2500. There I had set the console of this 
> QorIQ based system to the typical
> 125600 baud for arm (also with the option BSP_CONSOLE_BAUD). Some were not 
> happy that there are two different
> baud rates for the different MVME boards.
> I personally find Paul's approach ok and if the default value (bsp-defaults) 
> eventually stays at 9600 baud on all
> these boards could everyone be happy?
I kept all the defaults at what they are now (usually 9600) to avoid surprises.

> 
>  ==============
> 
> This patch series makes all the mvme BSPs consistent so I plan to
> merge these today.
> 

Moving the legacy network code broke the patches that added baud rate 
configuration to the ".yml" files.  I'll resubmit  the patches after I've 
tested a recent version, but I'll need to pull down the new legacy network 
branch and build that as well.  Hopefully all goes smoothly and I'll find time 
today.

FYI, since other people are working in this area: I'll soon submit a PCI 
multi-port serial driver for an eight port PMC serial port card.  Some of the 
files will need to be shuffled around.

Peter
-----------------
Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering

This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to 
interception and tampering.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to