ok
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:59 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Update #3993. > --- > c-user/semaphore/directives.rst | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst b/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst > index 54f40a4..7c2a9c8 100644 > --- a/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst > +++ b/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst > @@ -525,9 +525,17 @@ scheduler. > :c:macro:`RTEMS_INVALID_ID` > There was no semaphore associated with the identifier specified by > ``id``. > > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_NOT_DEFINED` > + The semaphore uses a priority ceiling and there was no priority ceiling > + defined for the :term:`home scheduler` of the calling task. > + > :c:macro:`RTEMS_UNSATISFIED` > The semaphore could not be obtained immediately. > > +:c:macro:`RTEMS_INVALID_PRIORITY` > + The semaphore uses a priority ceiling and the calling task had a current > + priority less than the priority ceiling. > + > :c:macro:`RTEMS_INCORRECT_STATE` > Acquiring of the local, binary semaphore by the calling task would have > cased a deadlock. > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
