Oh, I definitely missed that. I'm not sure though, but other patches have used
#ifdef. So I should only resubmit this patch then?
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:29 PM
To: Ryan Long <ryan.l...@oarcorp.com>
Cc: devel@rtems.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] main_cp.c: Unused value (CID #1255344)
> On 6 Apr 2021, at 5:38 am, Ryan Long <ryan.l...@oarcorp.com> wrote:
>
> CID 1255344: Unused value in copy().
>
> Closes #4339
> ---
> cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c | 64
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c
> b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c index cddbc95..2984a50 100644
> --- a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c
> +++ b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c
> @@ -310,11 +310,31 @@ copy(rtems_shell_cp_globals* cp_globals,
> case FTS_ERR:
> warnx("%s: %s",
> curr->fts_path, strerror(curr->fts_errno));
> + #if __rtems__
Is this ok or should it be #ifdef?
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
