Oh, I definitely missed that. I'm not sure though, but other patches have used #ifdef. So I should only resubmit this patch then?
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Johns <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:29 PM To: Ryan Long <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] main_cp.c: Unused value (CID #1255344) > On 6 Apr 2021, at 5:38 am, Ryan Long <[email protected]> wrote: > > CID 1255344: Unused value in copy(). > > Closes #4339 > --- > cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c | 64 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c > b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c index cddbc95..2984a50 100644 > --- a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c > +++ b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_cp.c > @@ -310,11 +310,31 @@ copy(rtems_shell_cp_globals* cp_globals, > case FTS_ERR: > warnx("%s: %s", > curr->fts_path, strerror(curr->fts_errno)); > + #if __rtems__ Is this ok or should it be #ifdef? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
