with the -rtems-test=Yes when you build the bsp?
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, March 28, 2021 12:37 AM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
> Did you enable all the tests and try to run it before you made modifications?
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021, 7:35 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> <zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>
>> What file do i have to check in ? I thought posix was a standard so the code
>> is platform agnostic? Is there code specific to the BSP? Also I tried to
>> modify the psxtimer02 test file and change it the clock_monotonic to see
>> what happens but when i run ./waf it does not reflect the changes I have
>> made. I don't see a corresponding executable in
>> /quick-start/src/rtems/build/sparc/erc32/testsuites/psxtests
>>
>> Thanks
>> Zack
>>
>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Saturday, March 27, 2021 9:22 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021, 3:52 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
>>> <zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I found a part of the assembly that says that the path is not called.
>>>>
>>>> if ( ( flags & POSIX_CONDITION_VARIABLES_CLOCK_MONOTONIC ) != 0 ) {
>>>>
>>>> 40005594: 12 80 00 39 bne 40005678
>>>> <_POSIX_Condition_variables_Wait_support+0x118> <== NEVER TAKEN
>>>>
>>>> 40005598: f4 27 bf e8 st %i2, [ %fp + -24 ]
>>>>
>>>> So if i'm correct The BSP supports this fuction of CLOCK_Monotonic
>>>> (because the assembly is archetcture specific)? Which means that there is
>>>> a need for the test I assume?
>>>>
>>>> Also does leon= the same as the bsp erc32-sis (or the one in the
>>>> tutorial)
>>>
>>> Please read the original source to confirm but I think you're right but it
>>> supports it but doesn't have a test.
>>>
>>> The ERC32 what's the first space hardened sparc processor. The leon3 is a
>>> later processor in the same family. Both use the same build of GCC and are
>>> just different bsps. In fact both run on the same sis simulator. It's just
>>> that a user starting today on a mission, is more likely to use the Leon3.
>>> The leon3 also can support SMP
>>>
>>>> Zack
>>>>
>>>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>>>>
>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>> On Saturday, March 27, 2021 7:50 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 2:33 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
>>>>> <zack_on_the_speed_cha...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> Last year I tried to do work and help to contribute to RTEMS. I didn't
>>>>>> get too far but now I think I now I have a better shot at it! I was able
>>>>>> to complete the BSP and tools build, and run the hello world examples. I
>>>>>> want to work on small tickets first and work my way into the source
>>>>>> code. The ticket is asking for a test clock_create with clock monotonic.
>>>>>> here is the link for the ticket I'm referring to
>>>>>> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3889 .My thinking is to look for code
>>>>>> that does something similar. In the ticket it says that there is a test
>>>>>> with clock_realtime. I was on the discord and someone suggested me to
>>>>>> looking to the coverage tests. How come i don't see the function
>>>>>> clock_create when looking at the annotated assembly code? Also I think
>>>>>> the test should be based on this
>>>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
>>>>>
>>>>> That was me on Discord. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep. psxtimer02 is a good test to start from since it is doing similar
>>>>> cases on a different clock.
>>>>>
>>>>> The coverage I was suggesting to look at is here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/joel/coverage/coverage-2021-02-28/
>>>>>
>>>>> Drill down to leon3 and posix and look at the timer methods (create,
>>>>> settime, gettime) for current coverage.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I warn you, it may or may not actually support the CLOCK_REALTIME and
>>>>> CLOCK_MONOTONIC as required here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/timer_create.html
>>>>>
>>>>> So coverage may be high because the implementation of the posix methods
>>>>> themselves are missing something.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pull the thread a bit to see if the methods support the clock value in
>>>>> question. If so, we just need tests. If not, some code gets added to the
>>>>> timer manager and tests get added.
>>>>>
>>>>> --joel
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Zack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>> devel@rtems.org
>>>>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> devel@rtems.org
>>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
