On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:52 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:56 AM Alex White <alex.wh...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Here is the status of the rtems-tools patches I have sent out over the > past few weeks (an X means the latest patch revision has been reviewed): > > > > > > > > [ ] tester: Limit branch coverage percentage precision > > > > [ ] coverage: Fix option processing on FreeBSD > > > > [ ] coverage/symbol-sets.ini : Add libtrace > > > > [ ] covoar/Reports: Fix empty branch report > > > > [ ] covoar: Fix overflow of high PC address > > > > [ ] covoar: Catch exceptional case > > > > [ ] covoar: Add option to create named objdumps > > > > [X] covoar: Fix null pointer dereference > > > > [X] coverage: Give coverage bars red background > > > > [X] coverage/reports: Share common JS and CSS in reports > > > > [X] coverage/reports: Improve formatting and clarity > > > > [X] covoar/reports: Add new statistics to summary > > > > [ ] covoar: Handle periods in symbols from objdump > > > > [ ] covoar: Account for build path change > > > > [ ] covoar: Fix DWARF reading > > > > [ ] covoar/TargetBase: Fix QEMU branch info > > > > [ ] covoar/CoverageReaderQEMU: Fix infinite loop > > > > [ ] covoar/Target_arm: Add THUMB branch instructions > > > > [ ] covoar/Target_i386: Add NOP patterns > > > > [ ] covoar: Fix NOP execution marking > > > > [X] tester: Add coverage variants for a few BSPs > > > > [X] tester: Remove target from BSP coverage configs > > > > [X] tester: Update to support new build system > > > > [ ] covoar: Add aarch64 target > > > > [X] covoar/TargetBase: Rename branchInstructions to > conditionalBranchInstructions > > > > [X] rld-process: Add named tempfile constructor > > > > [X] rld-dwarf: Fix file::get_source > > > > [X] rld-dwarf: Add function::has_entry_pc > > > > > > > > I sent these patches as a firehose, so I am not surprised that some > didn’t get a response. :) > > > > > > > > My plan is to resend the patches that have not been reviewed and meter > them out so I don’t overwhelm the list. Hopefully that will allow us to > better work through this list. Is that ok? > > > > Yes. You and Joel may also like to track these with a spreadsheet. I'd > be willing to open one when asked :) > Alex.. that's a not so subtle hint to create a Google sheet to track these, make it world readable, and perhaps give Gedare and I permission to edit it. :) --joel > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
