this one looks fine to me by inspection.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:35 AM Stephen Clark <stephen.cl...@oarcorp.com> wrote:
>
> Using 32bit types like uint32_t for pointers creates issues on 64 bit
> architectures like AArch64. Replaced occurrences of these with uintptr_t,
> which will work for both 32 and 64 bit architectures.
> ---
> cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt-shell.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt-shell.c
> b/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt-shell.c
> index b0894c1d38..61f20765e0 100644
> --- a/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt-shell.c
> +++ b/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt-shell.c
> @@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ static long rtems_fdt_test_timeout = 5;
> static rtems_fdt_handle cmd_fdt_handle;
>
> static void
> -rtems_fdt_write (uint32_t address, uint32_t value)
> +rtems_fdt_write (uintptr_t address, uint32_t value)
> {
> volatile uint32_t* ap = (uint32_t*) address;
> *ap = value;
> }
>
> static uint32_t
> -rtems_fdt_read (uint32_t address)
> +rtems_fdt_read (uintptr_t address)
> {
> volatile uint32_t* ap = (uint32_t*) address;
> return *ap;
> --
> 2.27.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
