This was my suggestion since the introduction of the waf build system preserved the names of the executables generated as compared to the autotools build, but offered different internal names when setting expected test states. The waf build system was new and different, so I thought it better to continue matching existing behavior.
Kinsey -----Original Message----- From: devel <devel-boun...@rtems.org> On Behalf Of Sebastian Huber Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 00:49 To: Ryan Long <ryan.l...@oarcorp.com>; devel@rtems.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bsps: Renamed YAML files to match test names On 18/03/2021 21:27, Ryan Long wrote: > Made the YAML file match the file name specified in the 'executable' > field. Fixed any references to the previous file names. Is this massive file renaming really necessary? Why can't we change the executable names to match with the YAML file name? -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Puchheim Germany email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 Registergericht: Amtsgericht München Registernummer: HRB 157899 Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
